Peptide related death highlights harmful impact of social media influencers

In March 2025, 75 year old Richard Norton passed away following cardiac arrest after he had injected the growth hormone analogue CJC-1295, and the synthetic pentapeptide (or “peptide”) Ipamorelin.

On Wednesday, Coroner David Ryan handed down his findings that Norton’s death resulted from his use of the peptides and hormone analogue. This is the first confirmed fatality from peptide use in Australia, although not the first time Australian health authorities have expressed concern at this rising unregulated trend.

Norton had been prescribed the unapproved medications from his doctor, Jerzy Muchnicki, yet hours before his death he told a nurse at the practice he had been “double dosing”. The ABC report that the nurse advised him to follow the prescribed dosage, yet shortly after when Norton injected a dose of CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin, he became unresponsive.

Coroner advises Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

The ABC further report:

The coroner recommended the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) review the therapeutic benefits and safety risks of peptides such as CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin and “consider whether further restrictions ought to be imposed on their use”.

In May this year the TGA published a warning on the risks of importing such unapproved peptides, with particular emphasis on the lack of proper labelling and the absence of safety testing. This was followed by another in June, in conjunction with Australia’s Chief Medical Officer. Following the coronial finding the TGA stated that it:

… continues to warn consumers about the risks of unapproved peptides which have not been assessed by the TGA for safety, quality or effectiveness.

And:

We are continuing to assess the risks associated with these products and considering whether further regulatory or other measures may be appropriate.

Medical Board Investigation

The coronial report into Norton’s death noted that The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency had previously been notified about Dr. Muchnicki’s treatment of Norton. The Medical Board of Australia (MBA) conducted an investigation, including a report from clinical professor Alistair Vickery. Professor Vickery observed:

There is insufficient evidence that CJC1295/Ipamorelin is safe, effective or beneficial for human use.

However, given Norton’s prior use of peptides and the written consent Dr. Muchnicki had gained from Norton, Vickery stated, “the clinical care provided by Dr Muchnicki was at a standard reasonably expected”. Nonetheless he observed Muchnicki’s notes were sparse and his performance as a practitioner was below standard for such an issue.

Research peptide vial labeled for research use only on a laboratory bench

What are peptides? What is “stacking”?

Chemically speaking, perhaps the best way to grasp what a peptide is, is to revisit what proteins are. This Wikipedia page on proteins has an image displaying the 3D nature of proteins, and touches on the nature of peptides. Proteins contain a minimum of 50 amino acids. Proteins will contain at least one polypeptide consisting of multiple peptides (above 50). The peptides that we’re interested in are best described as short chains of amino acids linked by peptide bonds. You are most welcome to read up on peptide bonds here.

Peptides (oligopeptides) contain 2 to 20 amino acids. We eat peptides, our body manufactures them and they can of course be manufactured in laboratories. The action of peptides explains their popularity. They bind to receptors on many types of cells and signal the promotion of biological processes. These may be pain relief (endorphins), skin repair and elasticity (collagen) and indeed those which have become very important to weight loss (GLP-1) and blood sugar control (insulin). Thus anti-ageing, weight loss, muscle growth and injury recovery are common claims from influencers pushing peptides.

Stacking involves the use of specific peptides and pentapeptides to achieve a spike in growth hormone and an extension of its half life. For example in the case of Richard Norton, his use of CJC-1295 is an unapproved way to stimulate the pituitary gland to release more growth hormone. When combined or “stacked” with the peptide Ipamorelin, the aim is to evoke a growth hormone spike, which is sustained by the growth hormone releasing analogue CJC-1295. Better known as a Drug Affinity Complex (DAC), CJC-1295 may elevate growth hormone by up to 10 times for 6 days, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) three-fold, by up to 11 days.

Peptide induced harm and hospitalisation

As the use of peptides has risen in Australia, so has the level of physical harm and consequent hospitalisation. In August this year the death from heart failure of Alex Boutin, led to increased focus on peptide use, from The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. In fact, Boutin’s death led to further consideration of how social media also impacts male users developing irrational obsession with body image. Use of steroids and peptides in men, is an indicator of a potential eating disorder, according to experts. [Peptide use linked to eating disorders – ABC AM programme – 3min, 7s].

NSW Health documented 1,180 presentations to hospital emergency departments following peptide use, between July 1, 2025, and September 30, 2026. Monthly attendances increased from 5 to over 220 during this period. In June this year, Victoria reported acute care requirements for severe anaphylaxis, acute liver toxicity and hospital admission resulting from peptides. Particularly Retatrutide, Reta, R-10 and R-20. WA has reported similar concerns as has QLD, Tasmania, the ACT and the NT.

Harms reported, overwhelmingly stress liver and kidney damage, unexplained hepatitis, unexplained acute pancreatitis, anaphylaxis and severe allergic reactions, GI distress and intractable vomiting. Warnings note that unsterile injecting can lead to systemic infections, sepsis, cellulitis or tissue damage resulting in amputations and skin grafts. Where testing has been done the peptide preparation has included impurities or been as low as 51% or as high as 190% of the advertised concentration. Some lack the ingredients entirely.

Unapproved and untested products include Retatrutide (liver toxicity), BPC-157, TB-500, CHK-Cu, CJC-1295, Melanotan II and more. In June this year RFK Jr. “unbanned” 14 peptides. You can read more on this here. The demand for peptides in Australia has been so great that Needle and Syringe Programmes established to prevent the spread of blood borne disease amongst injection drug users, have reported a notable impact on service provision.

There is little doubt that the promotion of peptides on social media is having a rapid and deleterious effect on many of those who choose to use them. Finally, there is no firm evidence that influencers can offer improved health and longevity to their followers.

Further Reading:

Slow change in Pharmacy Diets since 2009 Choice review

In early 2009 Australia’s consumer advocacy group CHOICE, produced a damning report on what were commonly referred to as Pharmacy Diets. With the increasing use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (semaglutide) it’s worth remembering that low energy diet formulas continue to provide income for pharmacies.

Pharmacists are trusted and valued by customers, and offer sound advice that impacts on the health of Australians. It’s likely that individual pharmacists can offer valuable dietary advice, as opposed to the big-brand diets found in certain pharmacy chains. In 2009 CHOICE made certain observations regarding the lack of suitability such diets exhibited, and further suggested detailed recommendations to improve consumer safety and the effectiveness of Pharmacy Diets. These were never adopted, nor enacted via legislative change. Their observations could be summarised as:

Pharmacy diet plans may help to shed extra kilos quickly, but most fail to deal effectively with the complex broader issues around weight loss.

CHOICE cannot recommend these programs until consultants improve their training and move beyond the “one-size-fits-all” approach.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported at the time that CHOICE had sent “shadow shoppers” to over 20 pharmacies. There were a range of pharmacy diets available at the time, but one drew not only justified criticism from CHOICE but also demonstrably unverified defence from the diet’s namesake. That diet was the Tony Ferguson Weight Loss Program, which persists today. Ferguson criticised the CHOICE findings, boasting that “600,000 people can’t be wrong”. Ferguson offered no evidence to confirm the success of his programme.

Along with UltraLite, CHOICE labelled Ferguson’s scheme “disgraceful and irresponsible”, for accepting children as young as 10 years old. In 2009 I used to publish a podcast called Firesnake: Critical Thought and Morality. It so happened that the CHOICE report featured in episode 53 on May 30th 2009. I’ve included that episode below with some clarifying notes about Firesnake, for readers who may be interested.

CHOICE had actually raised points that should have led to stricter control of both the diets and the training of staff. What actually did follow was industry self-regulation, with some inclusion over time of basic medical guidelines. CHOICE had highlighted three primary issues with the diets.

  1. Nutritional deficiencies: The pharmacy diet shakes failed to provide the minimum recommended daily intake (RDI) for vitamins and minerals, which posed the risk of nutrient deficiency. Research at the time highlighted the need of clinicians in ensuring adequate dietary standards would be met.
  2. Inadequate training of staff: The CHOICE shadow shoppers found staff lacked proper nutrition and weight management training which manifested as poor or inconsistent health advice.
  3. Commercial Push over health: There was an emphasis on selling kits and signing clientele to programmes, when a focus on evidence-based lifestyle and behavioural counselling should have taken precedence.
Worried shopper surrounded by weight-loss and dietary supplements

The timing of the CHOICE report was also significant. In 2009 the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing, held its inquiry, Weighing it up – obesity in Australia. In February 2013 the Australian Government published its response. Whilst the Committee recommended tightening rules on a number of weight loss products, the role and regulation of pharmacies was omitted.

In late 2011 the Pharmacy Guild of Australia was criticised for launching a weight loss scheme with a Melbourne-based genetic testing company. The approach sought to sell the idea that an individuals genetic profile would provide customised information to assist with weight loss. Labelled a gimmick this was followed by calls for the Government to review how it handles business with the Guild. This ABC PM programme (4.5 min) provides an excellent summary.

The Pharmacy Guild and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, continue to issue their own guidelines on weight loss management. Compliance is mostly voluntary. Larger chains such as Amcal and Priceline today provide consultations, BMI measurements, lifestyle and portion advice.

Failure to adopt the recommendations of CHOICE or legislate for permanent change has ensured the sale of Very Low Energy Diets (VLEDs) in the form of shakes, bars and soups has continued from Australian pharmacies. They are highly commercialised and product-based. Long term use is an issue that should be strictly monitored as VLEDs cause mild to moderate ketosis.

A 2012 review of pharmacy based diets in NSW found that customers had concerns about expertise and time available for their needs. Nonetheless, the authors concluded that addressing problems associated with pharmacy diets would assist in improving their profile as an option for weight management programmes. One waits patiently for said problems to be addressed.

Today VLED brands such as Optislim, Optimist and Tony Ferguson, alongside retail meal replacement brands such as The Man Shake and nonsense like FatBlaster can be found in pharmacies. There is little doubt that when considering an investment in weight loss, the advice of a qualified dietician particularly in conjunction with visits to ones GP and appropriate blood tests, will yield the best tailored dietary advice.

Firesnake: Critical Thought and Morality – Episode 53 – Pharmacy Diets

Notes on Firesnake

  • Firesnake was a podcast published from 2007 – 2009, focusing on critical thought, skepticism and morality. Approximately 60 episodes were published. The host was myself, using an old nickname “Gags”.
  • A popular segment was the “CPDCT AWARD” often held toward the end of each episode. This highlighted a Clear And Present Danger To Critical Thought, and being cunningly rigged, saw the title awarded to the main subject of the episode.
  • References for each episode were published on Delicious (originally del.icio.us) which was a now defunct bookmarking platform. This may be mentioned.
  • Firesnake no longer exists as a podcast, but the original Libsyn account remains, and has been used to publish audio and documents that feature in posts on this blog. Thus, searching for the podcast by name will likely bring up a list of audio snippets mostly used to highlight anti-vaccine lobbyists.

Conspiracy theories target Dolly Parton

It should be hard to believe. The fact that conspiracy theorists have wheeled out a range of absurd claims purporting to reveal, or guess at, the cause of Dolly Parton’s death. But it’s not hard to believe. In fact it’s exactly what anybody who keeps an eye on cooked conspiracy theorists across the globe expected. It happens regularly when vaccine status can be confirmed, and rapidly and loudly when the individual is a celebrity.

In Dolly’s case she had donated $1 million to Vanderbilt University Medical Center to assist with early research into Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. She also publicly had her shot in March 2021, and to the tune of “Jolene” sang “Vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, I’m begging of you please don’t hesitate“. Clearly Dolly knew the stakes and the impact anti-vaxxers were having. At 75 she herself was in the age cohort for which being vaccinated against COVID can save lives and reduce hospitalisations. No doubt her focus that day, led to jabs and saved lives.

Dolly Parton holding a guitar beneath a banner reading A TRIBUTE TO A LEGEND DOLLY PARTON (1946 - 2024).


Yet far-right radio host Wayne Allyn Root argued on X:

She took the vax on TV. She changed the name of her hit song “Jolene, Jolene” to “Vaccine, Vaccine”. She encouraged fans to get it. Now she’s dead of cancer. This sounds like another case of turbo cancer. RIP Dolly.

There is no such thing as “turbo cancer”. On that, oncologists are unanimous. It’s a bogus term made up to evoke emotional responses, and fool individuals to make choices not related to science-based medicine. It was covered here in March last year. The Brownstone Institute was founded last year by close friend and ally of RFK Jr., Jeffrey Tucker. Toby Rogers who works with the Trump allied Institute, observed that Dolly thought she was doing the right thing backing the vaccine, “But it very well may have killed her”.

Let’s not forget Dolly the Sheep and the convoluted thinking that leads us to ponder if Dolly Parton may have actually been a clone. Originally shared with our poor planet in 2013 by UFO aficionado and conspiracy obsessive Max Spiers (now deceased). One learns that the sheep was named “Dolly” as a symbolic nod to Parton who was part of the “early mass-consumption cloning experiments”. Conspiracy theorist “Danielle knows a lot” has resurrected this particular nonsense.

Anti-science diva, Valerie Anne Smith is a raging anti-vaxxer with particular focus on COVID and HPV vaccines. In the absence of a public record, Smith could in no way know what vaccines Dolly Parton has recently had. Yet she manages seemingly straight-faced to post on X:


Fortunately some accounts aim for the truth.


Apart from X there is plenty of the same on Facebook which happens to include the bizarre claim of Satanic ritual involving a section of video, and based on what Dolly is doing with her hands. In the video Dolly thanks Taylor Swift and her hubby Travis Kelce for their $2 million donation to her literacy charity, Imagination Library. Parton expresses her thanks and adds, “Now, it’s evident you two have made giving back a key part of your lives, so hey when you have your firstborn can I have it, because that is gonna be one special baby”. She is of course, joking.

Conspiracy fans contend that Parton made the “devil horns” symbol with satanic intent. In reality as she moves her hands her index and small finger do extend for around a second. It’s a non-event, and worth checking the short video to assess for yourself. In reality, the gesture is linked to warding off evil, heavy metal, insults and various cultural and regional meanings, depending on the part of the world. Not unexpectedly, this tale was retold by Red Pill USA whilst being linked to Dolly’s involvement with Moderna.

Nothing to see here, folks, just Dolly Parton – the same woman who dropped $1 million to help fund the Moderna COVID vaccine – flashing devil horns while casually demanding Taylor Swift’s and Trevor Kelce’s firstborn child. It’s a big Satanic club… and you ain’t in it.

Speak for yourself Red. Nonetheless, the sheer scale of claims on X that “turbo cancer” is the cause of Dolly Parton’s death as a direct result of a COVID vaccine she had 5 1/2 years ago, speaks volumes as to just how distorted Musk’s platform has become. In addition the fact that such claims have spread across social media remind us that conspiracy theories remain alarmingly persistent. No evidence is ever presented, no reputable sources are cited, yet these ridiculous fantasies continue to be furiously defended.

Dolly Parton died from cancer. She did not die from “turbo cancer”. There is no such thing.

Grifter Dolly Adamson awarded Australian Skeptics’ Bent Spoon

There’s a lot wrong with struggling actor and onetime brains behind Daylesford’s Disco Bingo. Dolly Adamson, now runs Victorian based Kyneton Paranormal. Reinventing herself as a talentless con artist, Dolly claims to use a “spirit box” to talk to murdered or missing children and supposed child murderers. Dolly is running a cruel and rather dimwitted scam, which no doubt helped her win The Australian Skeptics’ Bent Spoon Award for 2026.

There were plenty of worthy contenders for the Bent Spoon this year, but a few particular things linked to Dolly led to her easily snatching victory. First Dolly is behaving like someone virtually looting any possible tale that might attract attention. She has spoken to the Beaumont Children who were apparently taken by a cannibal, spoken to Joan of Arc, Princess Diana, pop and rock stars and even Harold Holt. Read more about her victory here on The Medical Republic.

However, her best effort is having a quick chat to Dessie Freeman from the spirit world. This featured on A Current Affair in early June, which thankfully has a stern deconstruction from Australian Skeptics’ paranormal researcher, Richard Saunders.

Dolly opens with, “Dessie you’ve just jumped in… did you say you got killed?”.

The assistant (potentially another struggling actor) replies, “Taken by the cold”.

Dolly replied, “Ah, sorry to hear that”.

The video, now deleted by Dolly from YouTube, was recorded when Freeman was alive and well.

Older witch with headphones tuning a mystical radio emitting ghostly voices
Dolly Adamson?

But the scam within the scam that infuriated this author, is that despite boasting that she uses a spirit box, you may have noticed that Dolly is fed crystal clear replies from the dead (and er… living) by her “assistant”. The assistant wears headphones and those watching hear nothing. So, what’s the problem?

A spirit box is basically an untuned radio scanner that snatches grabs of AM or FM radio. One should expect white noise, screeches, bleeps and random sounds ghost hunters associate with words. Devotees of the device claim that spirits use the wandering tuner to latch onto crude sounding “words”, and in doing so convey a message.

Even the best communicators tend to interpret one to three words and these are never in the form of a clear sentence, as Dolly and Co. produce. Indeed the phenomenon that hunters succumb to is audio pareidolia but the clincher is that the “answers” almost never have anyothing to do with the questions ghost hunters ask. Check these chaps here.

Dolly was “told” by a victim of the Erin Patterson mushroom case, “The story’s wrong”.

Dolly asks the missing mother of Savannah Guthrie, “Is there anything we can tell your children? Where did he put you?”.

The answer immediately follows; “Mountain. With lake”.

Oh really? Arizona where Nancy Guthrie disappeared has a famous hiking trail called Lake Mountain trail near the Lake Mountain complex located on – you guessed it – Lake Mountain.

At another point the assistant says “Is mummy there?”, in apparent reference to 4 year old Gus Lamont who disappeared in outback South Australia in September 2025.

Dolly offers; “Hello sweetie. Do you want to play with my dog?”

On her page promoting herself as an actor Dolly says her aim is to make people smile. Regrettably, she may be having fun but has cultivated an unlikeable persona and clearly has no idea how offensive her little gig actually is.

In response to lost work during COVID Dolly reinvented herself as the brains behind Disco Bingo in Daylesford. Still, on 1st May 2025 Dolly posted an offensive post recounting how Dolly and her daughter Asha along with Simone Patrice and Sarah Wright had a podcast chat with the Beaumont children. “They are dancing now. Their story has been told and they are healing on the other side with their parents.”

How predictable.

So yes, the desperate actor who seemingly has an abundance of confidence and even more callousness, thinks the entire scam is close to hilarious. In a world of make-believe acting, Dolly Adamson and her woo mates reckon they can scam and fool enough people to make some money.

We’ll be watching.

“An Inconvenient Study” was designed to fool the susceptible

The so-called compelling health differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children is a favourite of the anti-vaccine movement. We can guess which group they insist is the most beset with illness and also make a sound judgement about the methodology used to form conclusions.

Simply put, using biased methodology will find that vaccines make children sick, say the anti-vaccine lobby, (just ignore its bias). Or to sound more convincing we may be told vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated. Such was the conclusion when a US supporter and promoter of Judy Wilyman (she “has done a great service to humanity”) ran flawed methodology over the two groups in 2020.

Judy’s mate, James Lyons-Weiler, head of the Institute of Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) and paediatrician Paul Thomas, had their paper published in the anti-vaccine themed predatory journal, the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research. It was also published, then later withdrawn, from the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. According to Retraction Watch the authors blamed “ghouls” when it was decided their data didn’t support conclusions.

According to Lyons-Weiler a “ghoul” is one working to have studies with results they dislike, ultimately retracted. Also, it was with a certain amusement I discovered when the paper appeared, that The Australian Vaccination-risks Network had donated $5,000 USD to the project. From whence did this generous donation originate dear reader? Well, back in 2016 the AVN pulled a stunt seeking donations for a High Court challenge against No Jab No Pay legislation, claiming to have raised either $160,000 or around $152,000. Inexplicably bypassing solicitors, they seemed to have barrister fees which left them holding close to $80,000. With no evidence they spent any money on anything, the AVN promised members they’d keep what they had for future trips to the USA vaccine battles.

Zombie in tattered robe injecting glowing syringe into burning book in old library
When James Lyons-Weiler and Paul Thomas had their anti-vaccine paper withdrawn, they blamed “ghouls”.

IPAK were known for publishing misleading VAERS-data “vaccine death” hit-jobs, on mRNA vaccines, such as this during the pandemic. You know the drill: it’s not a real vaccine, believe all VAERS reports as true and conclude that the vaccine, not the virus, is responsible for deaths. Even more interesting is that the predatory International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research, is where Julian Gillespie published his The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine. I have touched on that effort many times. Gillespie had resigned from the legal profession but was promoted as AVN’s barrister during their pandemic legal battles. He was the brains behind many of their legal failures which were followed by his own complaints against senior Federal Court identities.

To appreciate a thorough debunking of the caper Lyons-Weiler and Thomas hoped to get away with, I recommend reading this piece at Health Feedback about the “dubious metric” used to feign the existence of a vaccine-related problem impacting children’s health. Notably, the third author attribution is Children’s Health Defense, well known at the time as RFK Jr.’s reason-for-being and nifty source of income. He stepped down as chairperson in 2023 to focus on his independent run for USA President.

Finally, there is no better deconstruction of the vaccinated vs unvaccinated myth than the video put together by biologist, Dr. Dan Wilson. Wilson’s YouTube channel Debunk the Funk has contributed enormously to evidence-based refutation of the anti-vaccine movement. He focuses on trends, conspiracy theories, individuals, organisations, frauds and liars and has teamed up with others such as Professor Dave Farina to tackle antivax fiction head on.

The Inconvenient Study is the most recent scheme of ICAN’s main attraction, Del Bigtree. Del appears to play a spy in the “documentary”, wearing hidden cameras to dinner to reveal that his interlocutors agree “it’s a good study”. Nonetheless, not once did he run across crocodiles or fight science on the roof of a speeding train. Bigtree… Del Bigtree, wrote and produced Vaxxed – a film made of lies – continued with Vaxxed II and is often by Andrew Wakefield’s film-making side. Bigtree also hosts the mysterious hedge-fund manager-funded, anti-vaccine drum beat, The Highwire.

Del’s aim is to bring his misleading “experience” to coax his viewers to believe that unfair forces are preventing publication of a study. This study was done at Henry Ford Health. The researchers who completed the data did not publish the study for a very simple reason; the study did not meet rigorous scientific standards. One can conclude dear reader, that a study or research approach may be very good. Yet if ultimately it does not meet the standards expected in its methodology, it cannot be published. That is not a conspiracy.

In this case it’s pretty basic. Children who are unvaccinated don’t tend to visit conventional doctors. Alternatively, vaccinated ones do. The latter group tend to be examined by a professional and an illness may be found, even without notable symptoms. The former group might have a neck cracked, chant with crystals, drink herbs or simply pray. No illness will be found without significant symptoms or complaints from the patient. In fact 15 years ago Australian GPs warned of chiropractors peddling anti-vaccine messages. Clients of chiropractors are notably vaccine-hesitant. We need to remain vigilant.

You’re going to need 90 minutes all up but I can assure you Dan offers a serious evidence-packed debunking of what is a nasty, indeed reprehensible attempt by Bigtree’s team, to mislead those who don’t have the time, background or critical thinking skills to find their way to the truth. I hope they find their way to Dan.

You can find Dan’s well sourced response here at YouTube.