Peptide related death highlights harmful impact of social media influencers

In March 2025, 75 year old Richard Norton passed away following cardiac arrest after he had injected the growth hormone analogue CJC-1295, and the synthetic pentapeptide (or “peptide”) Ipamorelin.

On Wednesday 28th October this year, Coroner David Ryan handed down his findings that Norton’s death resulted from his use of the peptides and hormone analogue. This is the first confirmed fatality from peptide use in Australia, although not the first time Australian health authorities have expressed concern at this rising unregulated trend.

Norton had been prescribed the unapproved medications from his doctor, Jerzy Muchnicki, yet hours before his death he told a nurse at the practice he had been “double dosing”. The ABC report that the nurse advised him to follow the prescribed dosage, yet shortly after when Norton injected a dose of CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin, he became unresponsive.

Coroner advises Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

The ABC further report:

The coroner recommended the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) review the therapeutic benefits and safety risks of peptides such as CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin and “consider whether further restrictions ought to be imposed on their use”.

In May this year the TGA published a warning on the risks of importing such unapproved peptides, with particular emphasis on the lack of proper labelling and the absence of safety testing. This was followed by another in June, in conjunction with Australia’s Chief Medical Officer. Following the coronial finding the TGA stated that it:

… continues to warn consumers about the risks of unapproved peptides which have not been assessed by the TGA for safety, quality or effectiveness.

And:

We are continuing to assess the risks associated with these products and considering whether further regulatory or other measures may be appropriate.

Medical Board Investigation

The coronial report into Norton’s death noted that The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency had previously been notified about Dr. Muchnicki’s treatment of Norton. The Medical Board of Australia (MBA) conducted an investigation, including a report from clinical professor Alistair Vickery. Professor Vickery observed:

There is insufficient evidence that CJC1295/Ipamorelin is safe, effective or beneficial for human use.

However, given Norton’s prior use of peptides and the written consent Dr. Muchnicki had gained from Norton, Vickery stated, “the clinical care provided by Dr Muchnicki was at a standard reasonably expected”. Nonetheless he observed Muchnicki’s notes were sparse and his performance as a practitioner was below standard for such an issue.

Research peptide vial labeled for research use only on a laboratory bench

What are peptides? What is “stacking”?

Chemically speaking, perhaps the best way to grasp what a peptide is, is to revisit what proteins are. This Wikipedia page on proteins has an image displaying the 3D nature of proteins, and touches on the nature of peptides. Proteins contain a minimum of 50 amino acids. Proteins will contain at least one polypeptide consisting of multiple peptides (above 50). The peptides that we’re interested in are best described as short chains of amino acids linked by peptide bonds. You are most welcome to read up on peptide bonds here.

Peptides (oligopeptides) contain 2 to 20 amino acids. We eat peptides, our body manufactures them and they can of course be manufactured in laboratories. The action of peptides explains their popularity. They bind to receptors on many types of cells and signal the promotion of biological processes. These may be pain relief (endorphins), skin repair and elasticity (collagen) and indeed those which have become very important to weight loss (GLP-1) and blood sugar control (insulin). Thus anti-ageing, weight loss, muscle growth and injury recovery are common claims from influencers pushing peptides.

“Stacking” involves the use of specific peptides and pentapeptides to achieve a spike in growth hormone and an extension of its half life. For example in the case of Richard Norton, his use of CJC-1295 is an unapproved way to stimulate the pituitary gland to release more growth hormone. When combined or “stacked” with the peptide Ipamorelin, the aim is to evoke a growth hormone spike, which is sustained by the growth hormone releasing analogue CJC-1295. Better known as a Drug Affinity Complex (DAC), CJC-1295 may elevate growth hormone by up to 10 times for 6 days, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) three-fold, by up to 11 days.

Peptide induced harm and hospitalisation

As the use of peptides has risen in Australia, so has the level of physical harm and consequent hospitalisation. In August this year the death from heart failure of Alex Boutin, led to increased focus on peptide use, from The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. In fact, Boutin’s death led to further consideration of how social media also impacts male users developing irrational obsession with body image. Use of steroids and peptides in men, is an indicator of a potential eating disorder, according to experts. [Peptide use linked to eating disorders – ABC AM programme – 3min, 7s].

NSW Health documented 1,180 presentations to hospital emergency departments following peptide use, between July 1, 2025, and September 30, 2026. Monthly attendances increased from 5 to over 220 during this period. In June this year, Victoria reported acute care requirements for severe anaphylaxis, acute liver toxicity and hospital admission resulting from peptides. Particularly Retatrutide, Reta, R-10 and R-20. WA has reported similar concerns as has QLD, Tasmania, the ACT and the NT.

Harms reported, overwhelmingly stress liver and kidney damage, unexplained hepatitis, unexplained acute pancreatitis, anaphylaxis and severe allergic reactions, GI distress and intractable vomiting. Warnings note that unsterile injecting can lead to systemic infections, sepsis, cellulitis or tissue damage resulting in amputations and skin grafts. Where testing has been done the peptide preparation has included impurities or been as low as 51% or as high as 190% of the advertised concentration. Some lack the ingredients entirely.

Unapproved and untested products include Retatrutide (liver toxicity), BPC-157, TB-500, CHK-Cu, CJC-1295, Melanotan II and more. In June this year RFK Jr. “unbanned” 14 peptides. You can read more on this here. The demand for peptides in Australia has been so great that Needle and Syringe Programmes established to prevent the spread of blood borne disease amongst injection drug users, have reported a notable impact on service provision.

There is little doubt that the promotion of peptides on social media is having a rapid and deleterious effect on many of those who choose to use them. Finally, there is no firm evidence that influencers can offer improved health and longevity to their followers.

Further Reading:

Slow change in Pharmacy Diets since 2009 Choice review

In early 2009 Australia’s consumer advocacy group CHOICE, produced a damning report on what were commonly referred to as Pharmacy Diets. With the increasing use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (semaglutide) it’s worth remembering that low energy diet formulas continue to provide income for pharmacies.

Pharmacists are trusted and valued by customers, and offer sound advice that impacts on the health of Australians. It’s likely that individual pharmacists can offer valuable dietary advice, as opposed to the big-brand diets found in certain pharmacy chains. In 2009 CHOICE made certain observations regarding the lack of suitability such diets exhibited, and further suggested detailed recommendations to improve consumer safety and the effectiveness of Pharmacy Diets. These were never adopted, nor enacted via legislative change. Their observations could be summarised as:

Pharmacy diet plans may help to shed extra kilos quickly, but most fail to deal effectively with the complex broader issues around weight loss.

CHOICE cannot recommend these programs until consultants improve their training and move beyond the “one-size-fits-all” approach.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported at the time that CHOICE had sent “shadow shoppers” to over 20 pharmacies. There were a range of pharmacy diets available at the time, but one drew not only justified criticism from CHOICE but also demonstrably unverified defence from the diet’s namesake. That diet was the Tony Ferguson Weight Loss Program, which persists today. Ferguson criticised the CHOICE findings, boasting that “600,000 people can’t be wrong”. Ferguson offered no evidence to confirm the success of his programme.

Along with UltraLite, CHOICE labelled Ferguson’s scheme “disgraceful and irresponsible”, for accepting children as young as 10 years old. In 2009 I used to publish a podcast called Firesnake: Critical Thought and Morality. It so happened that the CHOICE report featured in episode 53 on May 30th 2009. I’ve included that episode below with some clarifying notes about Firesnake, for readers who may be interested.

CHOICE had actually raised points that should have led to stricter control of both the diets and the training of staff. What actually did follow was industry self-regulation, with some inclusion over time of basic medical guidelines. CHOICE had highlighted three primary issues with the diets.

  1. Nutritional deficiencies: The pharmacy diet shakes failed to provide the minimum recommended daily intake (RDI) for vitamins and minerals, which posed the risk of nutrient deficiency. Research at the time highlighted the need of clinicians in ensuring adequate dietary standards would be met.
  2. Inadequate training of staff: The CHOICE shadow shoppers found staff lacked proper nutrition and weight management training which manifested as poor or inconsistent health advice.
  3. Commercial Push over health: There was an emphasis on selling kits and signing clientele to programmes, when a focus on evidence-based lifestyle and behavioural counselling should have taken precedence.
Worried shopper surrounded by weight-loss and dietary supplements

The timing of the CHOICE report was also significant. In 2009 the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing, held its inquiry, Weighing it up – obesity in Australia. In February 2013 the Australian Government published its response. Whilst the Committee recommended tightening rules on a number of weight loss products, the role and regulation of pharmacies was omitted.

In late 2011 the Pharmacy Guild of Australia was criticised for launching a weight loss scheme with a Melbourne-based genetic testing company. The approach sought to sell the idea that an individuals genetic profile would provide customised information to assist with weight loss. Labelled a gimmick this was followed by calls for the Government to review how it handles business with the Guild. This ABC PM programme (4.5 min) provides an excellent summary.

The Pharmacy Guild and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, continue to issue their own guidelines on weight loss management. Compliance is mostly voluntary. Larger chains such as Amcal and Priceline today provide consultations, BMI measurements, lifestyle and portion advice.

Failure to adopt the recommendations of CHOICE or legislate for permanent change has ensured the sale of Very Low Energy Diets (VLEDs) in the form of shakes, bars and soups has continued from Australian pharmacies. They are highly commercialised and product-based. Long term use is an issue that should be strictly monitored as VLEDs cause mild to moderate ketosis.

A 2012 review of pharmacy based diets in NSW found that customers had concerns about expertise and time available for their needs. Nonetheless, the authors concluded that addressing problems associated with pharmacy diets would assist in improving their profile as an option for weight management programmes. One waits patiently for said problems to be addressed.

Today VLED brands such as Optislim, Optimist and Tony Ferguson, alongside retail meal replacement brands such as The Man Shake and nonsense like FatBlaster can be found in pharmacies. There is little doubt that when considering an investment in weight loss, the advice of a qualified dietician particularly in conjunction with visits to ones GP and appropriate blood tests, will yield the best tailored dietary advice.

Firesnake: Critical Thought and Morality – Episode 53 – Pharmacy Diets

Notes on Firesnake

  • Firesnake was a podcast published from 2007 – 2009, focusing on critical thought, skepticism and morality. Approximately 60 episodes were published. The host was myself, using an old nickname “Gags”.
  • A popular segment was the “CPDCT AWARD” often held toward the end of each episode. This highlighted a Clear And Present Danger To Critical Thought, and being cunningly rigged, saw the title awarded to the main subject of the episode.
  • References for each episode were published on Delicious (originally del.icio.us) which was a now defunct bookmarking platform. This may be mentioned.
  • Firesnake no longer exists as a podcast, but the original Libsyn account remains, and has been used to publish audio and documents that feature in posts on this blog. Thus, searching for the podcast by name will likely bring up a list of audio snippets mostly used to highlight anti-vaccine lobbyists.

Is MAGA a Cult?

Terry Kelly is a past-president of the Australian Skeptics Victorian Branch Inc, and has an extensive background in the Melbourne Skeptics scene. He has contributed to committee activities, the organising of multiple conferences, speaking nights, conventions and more, whilst frequently being available as a speaker at Skeptics Café and Skeptics In The Pub evenings.

On April 20th this year, Terry Kelly took to the podium at the Stolberg Hotel, situated on the corner of Bell Street and Plenty Road Preston for a Skeptics Café presentation. His topic was Is MAGA a Cult? | Source Facebook | Terry has read quite a bit on the topic of cults and keeps a sharp eye on Donald Trump. Trump’s popularity has waned somewhat, but only after truly arrogant and inhumane exercise of his power in various political theatres. Still, those who adore him cannot be reasoned with. How deep is this ideology?

Terry summarises how AI tackles the cult question, reminds us of how bizarre Trump’s “spiritual advisor” can be and the role of conspiracy theory thinking being accepted as fact, within MAGA. Cults can self destruct in a reasonably short time, or go on to build size, power, influence and respect. The latter may last for decades or more. Terry even treats viewers to an account of his own brief experience with a cult, a method of depersonalisation he witnessed and what questioning accepted beliefs ultimately invites.

What type of people succeed in leading cults? Can they ever be successful? Why do they die off? What tragedies can we link to famous cults solely as a function of their beliefs and the influence of a single leader? Terry examines what makes a cult leader and considers if Trump has the right characteristics. He reminds us of what influenced Trump, including Norman Vincent Peale’s, The Power of Positive Thinking and of the critical deconstruction of Trump, Too Much and Never Enough written by his niece, psychologist Mary Trump.

There’s plenty more I haven’t touched on, and a discussion around questions. The audio volume of questions asked on the night was low, but has since been fully amplified prior to upload to Facebook. I hope viewers can enjoy them.

Speaker crying at rally while protesters hold signs saying 'MAGA is a cult' and 'Think for yourself'
The AI image above reflects what I hope awaits any possible MAGA cult

Belinda Gae Harris convicted, sentenced over Black Salve sale and supply

Just over a year ago I posted that 12 charges had been brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions against Belinda Gae Harris over the supply and advertising of black salve products. This followed an investigation by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), which confirmed alleged criminal offences under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act), against Harris.

Harris insisted on her blog she was “helping people” and had written on Facebook about using the dangerous corrosive to “suck out” snake bite poison and COVID-19 vaccines from the injection site. The TGA reported at the time she faced up to “a maximum penalty of 12 months’ imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $222,000 for each charge”. Harris, who traded under ‘Tickety Boo Herbal’, was manifestly spared the maximum sentence. Found guilty of 10 charges on 30 October 2025 in Deniliquin Local Court, the TGA reported on 16 January 2026, that Harris had been:

[S]entenced today to 7 months imprisonment, a community corrections order, and fines of $20,000 for unlawfully advertising and supplying black salve and bloodroot capsules, and for advertising other unapproved therapeutic goods to treat serious conditions such as anxiety.

And that:

Ms Harris was released on recognizance of $2,000 and on condition of good behaviour for a period of 3 years with 6 months supervision. Ms Harris is prohibited from making restricted and prohibited representations about therapeutic goods by any means, including on social media. The term of imprisonment can be imposed if the conditions of the good behaviour bond are breached.

Ms Harris is also subject to a community corrections order with a supervision period of 3 years.

The prohibitions regarding publication about therapeutic goods, particularly on social media, and the threat of prison linked to the good behaviour bond, are certainly welcome. Let’s revisit some of Harris’ response to the charges last January:

belinda_gae_harris

I’m just going to keep doing it, because I’m helping people and I’m saving lives. My angels managed to keep this at bay until 2025… This matrix is bullshit. Bullshit lies. They’re allowed to administer carcinogenic chemotherapy to people and fry the fuck out of them with their radiation.

But I’m not allowed to do a simple herbal remedy that I have tested over and over again… I’ll see you in court government… You can’t shut me up. If you put me in jail I’ll just be educating everybody around me. Okay. Namaste. Loving you. Ben Abou.

Okay. Namaste it is.

Her Honour, Magistrate Humphreys, said “the offending was deliberate and planned”. She added:

The Court has an obligation to deter similar offending as it is of a kind that could cause great harm…

…The existence of a community of persons interested in the use of potentially dangerous alternative treatments for serious illnesses such as cancer adds weight to the need for general deterrence. Others involved in such communities must be dissuaded from engaging in similar conduct

In a welcome addition the magistrate also noted the indirect harm Harris’ actions had caused, in that there was, “a real potential for users of the product to delay seeking or obtaining conventional treatment”. This is an important point and often overlooked. Regardless of potential harm, any treatment that interferes with evidence-based medicine or leads to patients withholding information from specialists, can prove disastrous.

Deputy Secretary of the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing and head of the TGA, Professor Anthony Lawler said he was pleased with the outcome. He continued:

This significant penalty sends a clear message to anyone seeking to profit from the unlawful supply and advertising of therapeutic goods. The TGA’s highest priority is protecting the health and safety of the Australian public, and products like black salve have the potential to cause serious harm to people.

We will continue to take strong and decisive action against those who disregard their legal obligations under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by advertising and supplying unapproved therapeutic goods.

Sanguinarine, a primary corrosive agent in black salve, is listed as a Schedule 10 substance in the Poisons Standard. These are described as substances “so dangerous to health that they are prohibited from sale, supply and use in Australia”.

Black Salve is a substance that helps nobody. Don’t be fooled by high-risk, untested so-called “alternatives”.

TGA links:

Paracetamol use in pregnancy | Therapeutic Goods Administration

Warnings from Donald Trump that acetaminophen (popular brand name Tylenol), also known as paracetamol (popular brand name Panadol) has a causative link to autism when taken by pregnant women are unsupported and rejected by health authorities world wide.

Absurdly, his ramblings were a unilateral seizure of what was apparently a planned nuanced announcement, prepared by his own so-called health administration. They intended a caution on Tylenol, a supposed treatment for autism and to reveal $50 million for autism research.

Using his feelings and purported anecdotes, Trump urged pregnant women to “fight like hell” against paracetamol. He reasoned with a bizarre risk-benefit myth that not taking the drug meant only good things would happen, opposed to the risk of bad things, if women took the drug. Yet the reality is that paracetamol/acetaminophen is necessary to combat fevers women may experience during pregnancy and that failure to treat fever can cause neurodevelopmental disorders for the unborn child. These include autism, ADHD or developmental delay. Another identified risk is miscarriage.

Trump also used vague anecdotes to link the vaccine schedule to childhood death and harm. There is no evidence for either Trump’s tale of vaccines killing the child of an employee, and no scientific evidence to justify the changing of vaccination schedules. Trump argued the Hepatitis B vaccine should be held off until 12 years. Yet the primary source of exposure for infants and children is maternal, not sexual activity as claimed by Trump. He further suggested spacing out Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccines as well as other combined vaccines. The apparent logic is that children are given too many antigens at once.

In fact, children receive fewer antigens today to combat a greater range of disease. Thirty years ago 30,000 antigens were required to encourage immunity against 8 diseases. Today’s US vaccine schedule uses 305 antigens to tackle 14 diseases. And active children take on 2,000 – 6,000 antigens daily through eating, playing and even breathing.

Pregnant women should fight like hell to ignore Donald Trump’s monumental woo.

Therapeutic Goods Administration Statement – 23 September 2025

  • Australia’s Chief Medical Officer and the TGA join with other global medicines regulators, leading clinicians and scientists worldwide in rejecting claims regarding the use of paracetamol in pregnancy, and the subsequent risk of development of ADHD or autism in children.
  • Robust scientific evidence shows no causal link between the use of paracetamol in pregnancy and autism or ADHD, with several large and reliable studies directly contradicting these claims.
  • Paracetamol remains the recommended treatment option for pain or fever in pregnant women when used as directed. Importantly, untreated fever and pain can pose risks to the unborn baby, highlighting the importance of managing these symptoms with recommended treatment. Pregnant women should speak to their healthcare professionals if they have questions about any medication during pregnancy.
  • Paracetamol remains pregnancy category A in Australia, meaning that it is considered safe for use in pregnancy when used according to directions in TGA-approved Product Information (PI) and Consumer Medicines Information (CMI) documents.
  • This means that a medicine has been taken by a large number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age without any proven increase in the frequency of malformations or other harmful effects on the fetus having been observed. As with the use of any medicine during pregnancy, people who are pregnant should seek medical advice tailored to their specific circumstances before taking paracetamol.
  • The TGA is responsible for ensuring the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG), with safety in pregnancy a key consideration for all products on the ARTG.
    The TGA undertakes evaluation of clinical, scientific and toxicological data prior to registration of a medicine, and this information is summarised in TGA-approved PI and CMI documents, targeted at healthcare professionals and consumers respectively, to help support safe use of a medicine in the community. These documents include information relating to use of a medicine in pregnancy.
  • The TGA is aware of announcements by the US Administration that use of paracetamol in pregnancy may be associated with an increased risk of autism and ADHD in children, though a causal association has not been established.
  • TGA advice on medicines in pregnancy is based on rigorous assessment of the best available scientific evidence. Any new evidence that could affect our recommendations would be carefully evaluated by our independent scientific experts.
  • Whilst there are published articles suggesting an association between maternal paracetamol use and childhood autism, they had methodological limitations. More recent and robust studies have refuted these claims, supporting the weight of other scientific evidence that does not support a causal link between paracetamol and autism or ADHD.
  • The TGA maintains robust post-market safety surveillance and pharmacovigilance processes for all medicines registered in Australia, including paracetamol. This includes detailed analysis of adverse event reports made by medicine consumers, clinicians and pharmaceutical companies, review of published medical literature, and close liaison with international medicines regulators. If a safety issue is confirmed prompt regulatory action is taken to mitigate risks.
  • International peer regulators including the Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom have reiterated that paracetamol should continue to be used in line with product information documents. Following evaluation in 2019 the European Medicines Agency (EMA) found that scientific evidence regarding effects of paracetamol on childhood neurodevelopment was inconclusive.
  • People who have concerns and are pregnant, or considering pregnancy, are advised to consult their healthcare professionals in the first instance to discuss this issue. [Source ©️ TGA]

GLOBAL NEWS COVERAGE