Recently Meryl Dorey donned her crown to proclaim across the land the pressing need to hide unwell and at risk children from child welfare departments.
The audio of Ms. Dorey’s video is below;
For almost 36 minutes Australia’s self appointed queen of medical system dissent sought to terrify and motivate her Facebook Live audience by creating the illusion that child services deployed something like Black Ops caseworkers. Dorey cited a letter from a FACS whistleblower to the minister responsible for FACS NSW. The whistleblower had apparently, “in his six or seven years of working for FACS had not taken a child off of (sic) one family”.
The task of removing children was left to a particular mold of caseworker who the whistleblower advised were known as “removalists”. Dorey couldn’t find the letter, which she had read on her iPad whilst in her bed chamber. I have no reason to believe the letter doesn’t exist and have seen the term “removalists” in a newspaper reader comment published prior to Dorey’s performance. Yet I am skeptical as to certain motives attributed to these “removalists” based on Ms. Dorey’s reading of the whistleblower’s letter. She tells her audience that, “so many of his, um, workmates were actually called removalists because that’s all they did they didn’t care what happened to the children, um, they just thought of it as either their power trip or um, [chuckle] their sadisticness (sic), I have no idea but they were moving so many children off of (sic) families without ever trying to keep them together”.
With this horrifying scene set in our minds we are reminded that it’s now twenty days since Chase has been with his family. A court hearing that day was adjourned until the 22nd of June 2017 and, “until that time the parents have no visitation. They can’t even see their son.” Dorey then continues with a comparison to the stories we read about in the papers, “all the time where DoCS or FACS or Child Protection has been told that a child is at risk, um, where they’ve had, you know, terrible physical harm to the children. Where they’ve been burnt, they’ve had broken bones, they’ve been beaten to within an inch of their lives. And those cases it seems FACS does not, um, does not do anything with them, and too often the child there dies or is, um, permanently injured and nothing is done”.
Yes, you read that correctly.
“But you have a case like Chase and so may other families where parents are absolutely doing the right thing by their children. They are taking good care of their children and, um, they get their kids ripped off of (sic) them and put into hospital situation or care situation where they can be harmed significantly and traumatised”. Dorey continues to customise this invented “hospital situation” horror with the conviction of someone who has actually been there continually monitoring Chase. He’s always been with his family but for the last twenty days has been lying in a hospital somewhere, “without anyone to love him, without anyone to take care of him, without anyone to see when he’s feeling harm or pain or whatever, and this is the situation that so many families find themselves in”.
Yes, she actually said that.
(See related ♣ Update at end of post)
Then it’s on to the conspiracy behind the most recent update to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders – DSM-5. Dorey reasons that High Functioning Autism and Asperger’s will no longer be diagnosed under autism (“which is a way the government is going to try to reduce the explosion of autistic diagnoses”). However this claim essentially contends that diagnoses of severity have been abandoned. This is not so. What this DSM-5 conspiracy basically supports is the belief that governments and health authorities across the globe will try to suppress the number of autism diagnoses in an attempt to suppress the fictional “vaccine-autism” link.
However autistic severity is based on social communication impairments and restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior (see Table 1). An extremely pertinent point with respect to severity is this reference to DSM-IV diagnoses which can be found in a great many references that rely on DSM-5 criteria. Eg; from CDC:
Note: Individuals with a well-established DSM-IV diagnosis of autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified should be given the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Individuals who have marked deficits in social communication, but whose symptoms do not otherwise meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder, should be evaluated for social (pragmatic) communication disorder.
Antivaccinationists want to have their DSM cake and scoff it down. Changes in the diagnosis of autism based on DSM criteria are not new. Demonstrably so the role of shifting diagnostic criteria in raising autism diagnoses is in no way an attempt to suppress the bogus “vaccine-autism” link . A September 2015 article in The Conversation looked at the widening diagnostic criteria of autism potentially changing what is regarded as normal.
Before 1980, the word “autistic” appeared in the DSM only as a trait to describe schizophrenia. But that doesn’t mean diagnostic criteria for autism didn’t exist. A 1956 article by Leo Kanner (who is credited with “discovering” autism) and Leon Eisenberg focused on two criteria: aloofness and a significant resistance to changes in routines, noticeable in a child by 24 months of age.
Further reading for those who favour or are familiar with Autism Speaks;
Dorey goes to great lengths to weave Munchausen syndrome by proxy into her fear campaign. She argues the DSM-5 term for this diagnosis is Medical child abuse. Rather, Factitious disorder imposed on another (FDIA) is the DSM-5 diagnostic term whilst medical child abuse has been in use for some time. Nonetheless Dorey wanders off into the realm of patently absurd claims as to what this abuse is. Primarily it is not abuse Dorey argues. Rather, “it is more symptoms that are involved with controlling how people raise their children”.
Homeschooling could lead to a diagnosis of medical child abuse. Eating or feeding your child organic foods. Being a vegan or vegetarian. These can all be used Dorey argues, “to say that you are abusing your child medically and, they can be taken off of (sic) you”. And then at last we get to what is indeed child abuse but for which there is no suggestion from government health departments that children will be removed due to medical neglect.
“Not vaccinating your child at all or fully could be medical child abuse and you could get your child removed from you”.
This indeed has meat on the bones. Considering people like Tasha David and others who insist their children are “vaccine injured” without any evidence and who subject these same children to dangerous pseudoscience based on a belief in widespread vaccine induced harm. Chase is a strong example where medical neglect albeit unintentional is clear.
At about the 6:20 mark Dorey tells us that up until about ten years ago she and her husband used to call their home the “underground railroad” due to the series of families they hid from FACS or DoCS. Dorey’s feelings about the “arrogant bastard” doctor from whom a family with a 12 month old baby with infected varicella sore on her face was fleeing are clear.
Dorey claims that about ten years ago the vaccine hadn’t been introduced. It was introduced in 1999. Nonetheless this family had fled from a hospital based doctor who was apparently going to prescribe IV antibiotics. The family wanted to try a topical antibiotic but we’re told the doctor lost his cool and threatened to call DoCS. The family took off and ran to the sanctuary of the Dorey household. A second opinion confirmed infection and puss were present. The advice was to simply keep it clean. As with Chase an alert (All Points Bulletin apparently) had been issued. We never hear of how this was legally resolved.
I must say, I have my doubts. Dorey has never mentioned this before nor any others on the “underground railroad”. I did document the August 2008 AVN money making scam through the shameful exploitation of a family that was hiding from authorities to avoid the neonatal hepatitis B vaccination for a newborn, born to an HBV positive mother. The AVN set up a fighting fund which ultimately made them just under $12,000. Although donors were led to believe this would help the family not one cent found their way to them.
As always – and this is exactly what I expect is the main game here – Meryl Dorey led her gullible followers into believing she will save them from the horrors outlined above. Join, donate, harass reputable authorities, MP’s and health advocates. With respect to the 2008 scam NSW Office of Liquor Gaming and Racing (who had cause to investigate the AVN at length) observed in October 2010:
During the course of the inquiry evidence of possible breaches of the Charitable Trusts Act 1993 was detected in relation to the following specific purpose appeals conducted by AVN:
Fighting Fund – to support a homeless family, allegedly seeking to avoid a court order to immunise a child with legal and living expenses. The appeal ran for a short time in 2008 and raised $11,810. None of the funds were spent on this purpose.
Clearly Dorey dreams up these scams and exploitation of gullible followers for her own benefit.
Back to her video and Meryl swiftly moved on to the notion of “communities”. She proposes caring about and protecting each other. If anyone is being pursued by police, “because of a stupid doctor who basically couldn’t care less about the health of the child but is caring more about their ego, come to my house and I will take you in”. Acknowledging what happened at the Church of Ubuntu she realises police numbers outweigh those who have no regard for the law. So the plan is to have 20 or 30 people in each area “around Australia” on call. Human shields, Dorey suggests. To defend against DoCS. Her audience likes the idea.
Of course she’s not looking for confrontation. Nah. They are “Martin Luther King or Gandhi-like people”, Dorey assures listeners. Having just said however, “if the police show up they’re going to have to come through me”. Australia “is becoming a dictatorship”, she offers in way of explanation. Then comes more deplorable deception about Chase. Dorey claims;
I wake up in the morning and the first thing I think about is where is Chase. Is he okay? Is he crying for his parents and doesn’t know where the heck he is? And you know I’ve seen too many families hurt this way and I can’t sit back and let this happen to another family without trying to do something.
This is of course, total nonsense. Dorey was not involved in the Chase Walker issue until all the drama and danger had passed. Then she publically attacked Peter Little on Facebook with the aim of belittling him and painting him as a worthless force. A very easy task to complete. Having pushed her way into the centre she is now busy selling the Meryl Dorey brand. As always you must act because;
“Today it was Mark and Cini. Tomorrow it could be you”.
Meryl had read a story about an elderly man whose daughter had power of attorney over him. She would take him to hospital where he didn’t want to go because “they treated him like garbage, they caused such pain and they were not making him better, the daughter was making him better”. Without explanation Dorey informs us that “the hospital” took power of attorney from the daughter who was arrested for trying to protect her father. She continues without a shred of evidence;
The father was taken to the hospital where he was killed by the hospital, they physically… and it turned out that because the hospital had made themselves guardian – not power of attorney of this older man, when he died half of his estate went to the hospital. There seems to be a financial interest in many of these cases. Not all of them but in some of them there does seem to be a financial interest.
Dorey advises her audience to register with a doctor via ACNEM – Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine. This is in case a Fan of The AVN must attend a hospital for an emergency. The ACNEM doctor can be the family doctor and if necessary can provide a second opinion. Hospital doctors should mostly comply. But as Dorey reminds us;
They act like lords and masters but they’re not. They are our employees but they certainly don’t act like it. If I had an employee that acted like most doctors do I would have fired them years ago.
Dorey goes on for another 10 minutes boasting of her moderator power and yet again pretending B52 is another person than her. Mark and Cini through no fault of their own other than not following doctors orders are suffering the consequences of ignoring medical advice. But this is of course misleading and harmful nonsense. Consider the screenshot from NSW Community Services (taken June 12, 2017).
NSW Community Services – Child Abuse, Neglect
With respect to Cini and Mark Walker, Sue Iraci writes in part in MJA Insight in “We must hold charlatans to account”;
This story starts in 2012, when a much-loved baby boy was born to a young couple. Although the pregnancy and birth appeared to progress normally, the newborn struggled from the outset, with thick meconium in the liquor, early oxygen desaturation and a seizure within hours of birth. As time progressed, the child was diagnosed with cerebral palsy, microcephaly and frequent seizures. Eventually, he was requiring multiple medications for seizure control, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding to minimise aspiration. […]
Early testing has not revealed a cause for the neurological problems, though a rare genetic cause is considered likely.
It is not clear what first set this family on the road to declaring the child “vaccine-injured”, but, by mid-to-late 2016, they had stopped using the recommended PEG formula, believing that he was allergic to it, and began substituting a homemade organic plant food puree diet, without the advice of a dietitian.
They also stopped the pharmaceutical medications and began giving the child unregulated cannabis oil, supplied by a deregistered doctor who had lost his registration due to personal polydrug use. They became part of a “church” that promotes the use of cannabis as a “healing herb” and, at around the same time, met a non-practising lawyer who encouraged them to “fight the system”. Having found in the neonatal records that the child had his first seizure prior to any vaccination, the narrative changed to “vitamin K damage”.
At the end of last month I published a post that looked at just how much harm Chase had been potentially subject to, and the shocking consequences to his health. There’s little doubt his parents were exploited by a mix of egotistical, reckless charlatans who hope to be unaccountable.
Meryl Dorey could have made use of evidence from last year’s NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into Child Protection. A number of problems were found with the present system. This is the result of a strong democracy, not Dorey’s “dictatorship”.
However dealing with facts has never been Meryl’s strong point.
♣ Update June 16, 2017; Thanks to a comment from Bridgette Fahey-Goldsmith I can confirm that Cini and Mark were offered a visit with Chase which they refused because they were “overwhelmed with fear” according to Paul Robert Burton from the church of Ubunto. One can perhaps find no more striking example of the harm caused to Cini, Mark and Chase by charlatans peddling sheer hysteria with respect to child services.
What appears to have happened is that Cini and Mark believed they would come to harm if they were taken to visit Chase on their own. But why? Given social media chatter planning to snatch Chase, I can only conclude that the army of screaming, spitting “supporters” wanted their chance to chant protest songs, wave signs, abuse staff, disturb patients, terrify Chase and quite likely try to remove him from hospital. FACS and hospital staff would have predicted this also. Thus the option for a family-only visit was offered. As this didn’t suit the hippy behind the curtain, the exhausted, paranoid parents were likely fed this story of them coming to harm, alone, “somewhere on their own without anybody”.
Below is a 52 second outtake from a Facebook Live caper on June 6th 2017 in which Paul Robert Burton informed his audience;
Now I did hear… here in New South Wales, [that] Family Community Services NSW did contact Cini and Mark and they made arrangements for them to go on their own unaccompanied somewhere, and they both freaked, uh, really concerned. I don’t know in truth if they asked for them to go with their children, or they asked to attend somewhere on their own without anybody. I’ve never heard of anything like that in my life, ya know, um, in a situation like this, so I too would be fearful and I wouldn’t go anywhere unaccompanied knowing these kind of things are happening, so they didn’t go for that appointment but not because they didn’t want to see their son, ya know um, just overwhelmed with fear, ya know…
Burton also peddles the “neglected in hospital theme” as Dorey did, for a few seconds later he asks, “Who’s huggin’ him, who’s lookin’ after him, who’s massagin’ him?” The message of fear and the suggestion of Chase suffering alone is unmistakable. Burton claims to have “never heard of anything like this in my life” and that he too would be too fearful to visit his son “in a situation like this… knowing these things are happening”.
What things? No “things” are happening. An exploited and neglected disabled child is having his health restored after months of abuse from calculating and/or deluded charlatans. This is manufactured rubbish. The parents brave enough to flee from authorities across state lines are suddenly in fear of their own safety to seize their proclaimed goal – a visit with Chase. Frighteningly in the near future he may well be back at the mercy of the many circling vultures who await the return of their anti-medicine proxy with glee.
Chase Walker is indeed a little boy lost.
Listen to the audio below:
Download the short Paul Robert Burton mp3 outtake here.
4 thoughts on “A Little Boy Lost and the Queen of stealing children”
Bravo! Another great read. I still have tears of laughter streaming down my face and I didn’t need a vino to get through it. One thing that might interest you though is that the parents were offered a visitation with Chase about a week or so ago and refused? Who knows why? But if you’re interested, shuttle down to 14 minutes and listen https://www.facebook.com/paulrobertburton/videos/10155549851923109/
Once again thank you!
Reblogged this on The Logical Place.
interested to know why you think the parents have been taken advantage of by the vultures surrounding them?
From what i have seen they have been fundraising and seeking donations since at least 2013 and have recieved more than $30,000 with that amount still growing every day, using vague open ended descriptions as to what the money is being used for. I also read how they were using a well known compensation law firm until mid 2016, when that law firm dropped their case as no fault on the hospitals part where the mother gave birth could be found. It seems the mother then went hunting knowingly for other causes to get involved in to be a good money earner since she wasn’t able to get a court pay out and found the anti vaccine community, changed her story to one of vaccine damage to jump on the so called class action law suit in the hope of gaining thousands or millions that way. She met up with Peter Little, a rather strange con man who has lied to hundreds of people to get financial gain for himself too, and she aligned herself with Ubuntu. All 3 of these people/groups have been sharing requests for her families need for donations, at least since the end of 2016. They have ranged from call outs for money for organic food so they can afford to feed their children, the childs organic plant based medicine, medical equipment, car repairs, travel expenses, extreme legal fees, and so on.
No proof is ever provided as to where this money has been spent or of any legitimate quotes. Since the Amber Alert, the fundraising scheme has upped it’s game with stickers available for purchase, a childrens story book with proceeds going to the family, t shirts can be bought, key rings, avocado’s with proceeds to the family, family fun days with raffles, door entry fees, prizes up for grabs and so on.
Although this family have been recieving government benefits to help support their children, they have previously told supporters they don’t get any government assistance as have stopped vaccinating so need money from the community. A lie to gather donations.
They were happy to recieve a payment from channel 7 for doing Sunday Night and seem pleased with their brand new SUV that was shown on the episode. Along with the approx $7000 in gofundme and undisclosed amounts being paid directly into their bank account and paypal.
The latest request is that somebody please give them a house in the Newcastle area, that preferably has a swimming pool along with $13000 needed in donations so they can live rent free for 6 months.
My original question, why do you think the parents have been taken advantage of by the vultures surrounding them?
In my opinion all of them have taken advantage of a child’s situation to better themselves financially in one way or another. The child is the sole victim who has been exploited. Not the parents.
Thanks for such a comprehensive and informative question, CC. I appreciate the research and attention to detail you’ve employed.
Essentially I agree with you. There’s very little to acquit Cini and Mark from charges of benefitting in a number of ways by exploiting Chase. Still, they are Chase’s parents and unlike other members of the anti-vaccination lobby don’t have a long standing pre-existing ideology to promote, due to his disability.
A number of charlatans peddling pseudoscience can promote themselves and also seek to profit personally due to the attention afforded Chase. They can only begin this process after securing the trust and permission from his parents. Peter Little would be an example of someone who convinced Cini and Mark he could help them legally. He failed frequently yet insisted he had put them on a positive path. Whilst using Chase’s dilemma to post constant Facebook live videos he would use the time and exposure to attack and make conspiratorial claims about others. Playing the role of legal saviour Little managed to keep a steady flow of money heading his way.
Meryl Dorey has been pushing the line that the Australian “dictatorship” seeks a mandate to vaccinate the population and remove the public’s right to make “health choices”. There was no surprise that she moved in to attack Peter Little’s efforts and set herself up as a self-appointed authority on Chase and the legality of his case, when all was safe and settled. This had an added effect of slowing Little’s donation stream. Dorey can now promote herself and seek donations in a much safer environment. If there is one thing Dorey manages to do well it’s to profit handsomely from these cases.
Katelaris has a long history of preparing and administering cannabis oil that does not meet clinical standards for the way in which he used it. In October last year the HCCC found that he provided health services in an unsafe and unethical manner. They identified 12 points including that;
The decision included;
A number of self-serving individuals from the offensively named “church” of ubuntu find Chase’s case a perfect excuse to engage their anti-establishment brain cell. With what appears to be a highly refined lack of insight they have screamed and wailed abuse at FACS authorities and police, allowed Cini to work herself into a state of near hysteria and finally be arrested, protested and chanted outside and inside public areas of hospitals, published personal details and hate speech about FACS staff involved in protecting Chase, plotted on Facebook to kidnap him from wherever he is.
The conduct of ubuntu members has had an extensively negative impact on the opportunity for Mark and Cini to work with child services staff in resolving a supervised return of Chase to the family environment. In order to sustain their fiction of authorities acting only to “medically kidnap” children in situations like Chase, Cini and Mark were dissuaded from taking up an invitation to visit Chase. They refused the visit due to fear because somewhere on their own without anybody they may come to harm. According to ubunto’s Paul Robert Burton they were “overwhelmed with fear”. Exactly what they were convinced would happen to them I’ve no idea but it was enough to significantly set back chances of engaging in Chase’s recovery.
It is especially this behaviour and that of Meryl Dorey – who seeks to organise a nation-wide “community” to fight against child services and police – that is simple ongoing exploitation of Cini and Mark. These aims are not designed to help Chase or his parents. They stem from using his case, misrepresenting the facts and extrapolating from the resulting fiction to ensure ongoing resistance to evidence based medicine, vaccination and the protection of vulnerable children from neglect.
So whilst I accept Cini and Mark are not being led by the hand, these individuals and others like them are the vultures who benefit from ensuring Chase’s parents don’t think for themselves.